CASE STUDY PREVIEW
Sequencing a capital programme against competing mandates.
Government · Public infrastructure · East Africa · Competing mandates
Context
A municipal authority held approved funding for four infrastructure programmes and the delivery capacity for two.
Decision tension
Each programme had a constituency. Ranking them politically was possible; defending the ranking afterwards was not.
Headline outcome
Programmes were sequenced against a published method rather than ranked. Two proceeded; two were scheduled with dates rather than deferred indefinitely.
CASE STUDY SIGN UP GATE
Create a free CPM account to unlock the full case study.
Your selected case study will be saved automatically. Sign up to access the full evidence, downloadable material, related journals and knowledge-graph connections.
Your place is saved automatically — you will return here after signing in.